American Society of Plant Taxonomists

New Jobs!

Powered by Sphider
 

You are here:
ASPT Publications / Systematic Botany / Systematic Botany

 

Systematic Botany Supplementary Data

Volumes with supplementary data available:

Volume 34, Issue 4:
Edwards, C. E., W. S. Judd, G. M. Ionta, and B. Herring. 2009. Using population genetic data as a tool to identify new species: Conradina cygniflora (Lamiaceae), a new, endangered species from Florida. Systematic Botany 34: 747-759.

Files: Replacement Figure 4.

Volume 34, Issue 3:
Kaplan, Z., J. Fehrer, and C. Barre Hellquist. 2009. New hybrid combinations revealed by molecular analysis: The unknown side of North American pondweed diversity (Potamogeton). Systematic Botany 34 (4): 625-642.

Files: Suppl. Materials.

Volume 34, Issue 3:
Fisher, A. E., J. K. Triplett, C.-S. Ho, A. D. Schiller, K. A. Oltrogge, E. S. Schroder, S. A. Kelchner, and L. G. Clark. 2009. Paraphyly in the bamboo subtribe Chusqueinae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) and a revised infrageneric classification for Chusquea. Systematic  Botany34 (4): 673-683.

Files: Suppl. Materials.

Volume 34, Issue 3:
Moon, H.-K., S.-P. Hong, E. Smets, and S. Huysmans. 2009. Micromorphology and character evolution of nutlets in tribe Mentheae (Nepetoideae, Lamiaceae). Systematic Botany 34 (4): 760-776.

Files: Suppl. Appendix 1.

Volume 34, Issue 3:
Costea, M., M. A. R. Wright, and S. Stefanovic. 2009. Untangling the systematics of salt marsh dodders: Cuscuta pacifica, a new segregate species from Cuscuta salina (Convolvulaceae). Systematic Botany 34 (4): 787-795.

Files: Suppl. Appendix 1; Suppl. Appendix 2.

Volume 34, Issue 3:
Wendy L. Clement and George D. Weiblen. 2009. Morphological evolution in the mulberry family (Moraceae). Systematic Botany 34(3): 530-552.

Files: Suppl. Appendix 1.

Volume 34, Issue 3:
Harald Schneider, Alan R. Smith, and Kathleen M. Pryer. 2009. Is morphology really at odds with molecules in estimating fern phylogeny? Systematic Botany 34(3): 455-475.

Files: Suppl. Appendix 1.

Volume 34, Issue 3:
Craig F. Barrett and John V. Freudenstein. 2009. Patterns of morphological and plastid DNA variation in the Corallorhiza striata species complex (Orchidaceae). Systematic Botany 34(3): 496-504.

Files: Suppl. Fig. 1; Suppl. Fig. 2.

Volume 34, Issue 2:
Andrea S. Vega, Gabriel H. Rua, Liliana T. Fabbri, and Zulma E. Rugolo de Agrasar. 2009. A morphology-based cladistic analysis of Digitaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae). Systematic Botany 34(2): 312-323.

Files: Suppl. Appendix 3.

Volume 34, Issue 1:
Ivonne Sanchez del-Pino, Thomas Borsch, and Timothy J. Motley. 2009. trnL-F and rpl16 sequence data and dense taxon sampling reveal monophyly of unilocular anthered Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae) and an improved picture of their internal relationships. Systematic Botany 34(1): 57-67.

Files: Suppl. Figs. 1-2.

Volume 34, Issue 1:
Jennifer A. Tate, M. Cristina Acosta, Joshua McDill, Eduardo A. Moscone, Beryl B. Simpson, and Andrea A. Cocucci. 2009. Phylogeny and character evolution in Nierembergia (Solanaceae): molecular, morphological, and cytogenetic evidence. Systematic Botany 34(1): 198-206.

Files: Suppl. Fig. 1.

Volume 34, Issue 1:
Flor Rodriguez and David M. Spooner. 2009. Nitrate reductase phylogeny of potato (Solanum sect. Petota) genomes with emphasis on the origins of the polyploid species. Systematic Botany 34(1): 207-219.

Files: Suppl. Figs. 1-4.

Volume 33, Issue 4:
M. Alejandra Jaramillo, Ricardo Callejas, Christopher Davidson, James F. Smith, Angela C. Stevens, and Eric J. Tepe. 2008. A phylogeny of the tropical genus Piper using ITS and chloroplast intron psbJ-petA. Systematic Botany 33(4): 647-660.

Files: Suppl. Fig. 1A; Suppl. Fig. 1B; Suppl. Fig. 1C; Suppl. Fig. 1D; Suppl. Fig. 1E; Suppl. Fig. 1F.

Volume 33, Issue 1:
Diego Fajardo, Raul Castillo, Alberto Salas, and David M. Spooner. 2008. A morphometric study of species boundaries of the wild potato Solanum series Conicibaccata: a replicated field trial in Andean Peru. Systematic Botany 33(1): 183-192.

Files: Suppl. Fig. 1; Suppl. Fig. 2; Suppl. Fig. 3; Suppl. Fig. 4; Suppl. Fig. 5; Suppl. Fig. 6; Suppl. Fig. 7; Suppl. Fig. 8; Morphometric Dataset.